🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."