🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly felt the weight of her family legacy. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the most famous UK artists of the turn of the 20th century, her name was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

In recent months, I contemplated these legacies as I got ready to record the inaugural album of the composer’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Featuring emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, her composition will offer music lovers valuable perspective into how she – a wartime composer originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her world as a woman of colour.

Shadows and Truth

But here’s the thing about shadows. One needs patience to adapt, to see shapes as they truly exist, to separate fact from distortion, and I was reluctant to address Avril’s past for a period.

I deeply hoped her to be a reflection of her father. Partially, she was. The rustic British sounds of her father’s impact can be heard in many of her works, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only examine the names of her family’s music to understand how he identified as both a champion of UK romantic tradition as well as a voice of the Black diaspora.

At this point father and daughter seemed to diverge.

American society judged Samuel by the excellence of his art as opposed to the his racial background.

Samuel’s African Roots

While he was studying at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – turned toward his African roots. Once the African American poet the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in the late 19th century, the aspiring artist was keen to meet him. He composed the poet’s African Romances to music and the subsequent year incorporated his poetry for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral piece that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an global success, especially with Black Americans who felt shared pride as the majority evaluated the composer by the brilliance of his music as opposed to the his race.

Principles and Actions

Recognition did not reduce Samuel’s politics. In 1900, he participated in the initial Pan African gathering in the UK where he met the prominent scholar this influential figure and saw a variety of discussions, covering the subjugation of African people in South Africa. He was an activist throughout his life. He kept connections with early civil rights leaders like this intellectual and the educator Washington, gave addresses on equality for all, and even talked about racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the White House in that year. As for his music, the scholar reflected, “he wrote his name so high as a composer that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He passed away in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. However, how would Samuel have reacted to his offspring’s move to be in this country in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to apartheid system,” declared a title in the African American magazine Jet magazine. The system “struck me as the correct approach”, she informed Jet. When pushed to clarify, she backtracked: she was not in favor with the system “fundamentally” and it “should be allowed to work itself out, guided by benevolent people of all races”. Were the composer more attuned to her father’s politics, or born in segregated America, she could have hesitated about this system. However, existence had sheltered her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I have a British passport,” she stated, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my background.” Therefore, with her “fair” complexion (as described), she moved alongside white society, buoyed up by their admiration for her late father. She delivered a lecture about her father’s music at the University of Cape Town and led the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, featuring the bold final section of her concerto, titled: “In memory of my Father.” While a skilled pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the soloist in her concerto. Instead, she invariably directed as the conductor; and so the orchestra of the era followed her lead.

The composer aspired, according to her, she “might bring a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, circumstances deteriorated. After authorities became aware of her mixed background, she could no longer stay the country. Her citizenship failed to safeguard her, the British high commissioner recommended her departure or be jailed. She went back to the UK, deeply ashamed as the extent of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a painful one,” she expressed. Compounding her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from the country.

A Familiar Story

Upon contemplating with these shadows, I perceived a recurring theme. The story of identifying as British until it’s revoked – that brings to mind African-descended soldiers who defended the British during the global conflict and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,